Ngannou, 37, meanwhile became a sensation overnight having stunned the world's best heavyweight boxer.

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X Specs | TechPowerUp GPU Database

AMD launched the Radeon R9 Fury X in a world where 4K gaming was only just becoming a thing, and high refresh rate 1080p and 1440 monitors were launching. Well, now we live in a world where those are aplenty, and even 4K 120Hz and above displays are now a reality. Without further ado, let's move into the rest of our re-look at the Radeon R9 Fury X graphics card and see how it keeps up in 2020. Benchmarks - Synthetic GPU Test Rig Specs But, the Cameroonian held his own and looked more than competent against Fury, so much so that many people thought he deserved the decision. Starting with Shadow of War at 1080p we see the higher memory bandwidth of the HBM2-based Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 as well as the Radeon VII pulling way far and out from the Fury X. The faster GDDR6 memory on the Navi-based Radeon RX 5000 series cards see it soar ahead of the HBM(1) on the Fury X. HBCC has no benefits to PC gamers outside of a few benchmarks and resolutions where it provides a few % more performance, but now we're seeing something very similar play out on next-gen consoles. The mix of PCIe 4.0 connectivity with a super-charged NVMe SSD and super-fast GDDR6 acting as huge chunks of ridiculously fast cache? That sounds like HBCC... or something at least close to it.Starting with Shadow of War, the Radeon R9 Fury X barely beats the GeForce GTX 1650, and gets demolished by the Radeon RX 5500 XT -- we're looking at 51FPS average for the Fury X and 61FPS average for the RX 5500 XT. The Radeon RX 5700 XT for comparison, hits 91FPS here at 1440p in Shadow of War. Now, the Cameroonian has opened up on what he said to Fury and how a pre-fight exchanged sparked the boasting.

X-rated Francis Ngannou reveals what he said to Tyson Fury in X-rated

NVIDIA is already pushing the boundaries of near 20Gbps on current GDDR6 tech, and we should expect AMD to get far closer to that with RDNA2-based Navi 2X graphics cards later this year. In this testing, I wanted to cover graphics cards from years ago right through to the new Turing-based GeForce RTX 2000 series cards and the flagship GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and Radeon RX 5700 XT on the Navi architecture. I've included older-gen cards with the Maxwell-based GeForce GTX 900 series led by the GTX 980 Ti, as well as the Pascal architecture with GeForce GTX 1000 series cards and its flagship GTX 1080 Ti. NVIDIA is also rumored to unveil something called NVCache, which sounds much like HBCC, with its next-gen Ampere GPU-based GeForce RTX 3080 Ti -- and other RTX 3000 series cards, later this year when it unveils the new family of graphics cards in September 2020.AMD will have a mystery release later this year for RDNA2 ( more on that here) and its new, and what should eventuate in the Radeon RX 6000 series cards. My sources have told me there will be no media event for this release, the first time in over a decade (or more) that no media event will be held for a new family of graphics cards being released. I'm alone in this game. I just came from another sport and there's a structure, a solid business and then you just come to rob that. HBM might have been a technological marvel at the time, and HBCC was pretty much marketing fluff -- but from a technological perspective I still admire what AMD was able to achieve with the Radeon R9 Fury X. The first graphics card with HBM memory, and it was an impressive feat. I knew it wasn't going to happen. I think it's a shame for boxing, though, and those judges they should be sanctioned.