For play and display – The AT-ST walker measures over 10.5 in. (26 cm) high, 6 in. (16 cm) long and 5 in. (13 cm) wide, and can be displayed between playtimes. App-assisted building – Instructions are included and, using the LEGO Building Instructions app, builders can zoom, rotate and visualise a digital version of the construction model as they build. The droid also includes four articulated legs with multiple sensors around the head, suitably varying to assess different wavelengths of light, radiation and other variables. Moreover, this sinister droid is mounted on a trans-clear column, elevating it above the ground. Despite feeling unnecessary within this set, the Imperial Probe Droid is a highlight. LEGO has introduced continual improvements in the design of the Imperial AT-ST and 75322 Hoth AT-ST represents the new pinnacle! This model includes fantastic detail and choosing to depict the lesser-known AT-ST variant was an excellent decision, complementing 75313 AT-AT and ensuring considerable differences when compared with the earlier AT-ST models. Construction toys for all ages – LEGO Star Wars sets allow kids (and adult fans) to recreate iconic scenes, make up new stories or just display the buildable models.

As a French speaker, I've never understood English's tendency to absolutly avoid the passive voice. We use it all the time in French, so everytime I'm writing in English, I need to fight myself to avoid it. But I don't always do. "Comparing this creation with 75153 AT-ST Walker exemplifies those significant changes, which remain unexplained in Star Wars canon. While the vehicle from Return of the Jedi is certainly more beloved, the lighter version arguably appears more appropriate for a scout walker and measures 27cm in height, narrowly surpassing the 2016 model. While, technically, you're right about the use of passive voice here, I think it works here, because (for me) it seemed to read like an introductory headline of sorts. For example, "this set is deserving of notice and here's why" (followed by the bullet points of positives and negatives). That's how I read it. I know that CapnRex101 is the reviewer, so I'm not altogether that concerned by whether the passive voice is used in the headlining statement.

There is enough space for one minifigure inside, with their blaster pistol and macrobinoculars stored on clips. The surrounding structure seems untidy, but firmly secures the armour panels and accommodates a printed control console for the driver. Ideally, there would be space for a second minifigure though, since that is something no minifigure-scale AT-ST has yet achieved. Admittedly, this walker exceeds minifigure-scale too, although I think it looks reasonable when displayed beside minifigures or the gargantuan 75313 AT-AT. After all, targeting total accuracy for minifigures would require a size approximating the rendition from 8038 The Battle of Endor. While that model is good, increasing the scale permits superior detail. The set was provided for review by LEGO. All opinions expressed are those of the author. Minifigures LEGO minifigures and a droid – Chewbacca with snow decoration, Hoth AT-ST Pilot and Hoth Rebel Trooper, each with weapons, plus an Imperial Probe Droid LEGO figure.

The differences between this model and previous examples are immediately apparent, beyond the expected advances in construction techniques and parts. 75153 AT-ST Walker and 75254 AT-ST Raider were reasonably similar and this design retains some features from those sets, especially in the structure of the legs. However, the proportions are completely unique, which matches the onscreen vehicle.

I think the related bullet point about the AT-ST being a 'lesser known' vehicle has the same problem, since I didn't know before reading the article that it differed from the one in Return of the Jedi. I wondered in what way an AT-ST in general was lesser known! Also, these narrow legs correspond with the source material, featuring impressive texture and subtle dark tan highlights. The poor articulation which has affected previous AT-STs remains the same though, only including basic hip joints. However, I think including additional articulation would require new elements or compromise the stability of this vehicle, so I understand the omission. You're misreading my suggestion, which is NOT to provide some formula for the summary comment. I am, however, observing that the existing comment has almost no content and therefore adds little value: