Logical Chess: Move By Move: Every Move Explained New Algebraic Edition (Irving Chernev)

Product Information

I've been playing Chess casually for years online(not many people I know play it), and I realized that my rating hadn't gotten better in years.

Certainly you shouldn't focus on the footnotes more so than the main article, and the same for chess. The games in part three have lessons more subtle than the first two part, I think the theme is that good positional development naturally leads to tactical opportunities. Please contact us in advance for advice on best procedure, as in certain circumstances we are able to send our courier to collect items.There is also a sufficient number of diagrams so that you won't get too lost as the game progresses. The moves are shown in the book using algebraic notation (e4, Nf3, Qxh8+ as examples) though the piece identifiers are shown as symbols of the pieces rather than R, N, B, Q, K, which I guess some would prefer.

I learned how to play from my mom as a kid, watched a few YouTube videos as an adult, and figured I could pick it up as I went along. However, this can only be done if one has a board by him following every move in the book [ you can but a small pocket size magnet set for cheap ] . In fact, one of the games, Blackburne-Blanchard, probably gained me 100 rating points in my class days.Chernev was extremely well-read in chess literature, and shares insights of many grandmasters, as these insights are illustrated in the games in this book. Sicilian defense (answering E4 with C5 offers counterattacking play especially on opponent too hellbent on kingside attack). The book was first published in 1957 so expect a game or two by Capablanca, Tarrasch, Rubenstein and Maroczy. Indeed, in later games, Chernev says exactly that, and gives examples of moves he previously criticised, with reasons for why it is different, or forced, or whatever.

Otherwise, this book imparts a fantastic vision such that novices should see their strategic vision begin to develop upon reading it.Some great many years later, after having not looked at a chessboard in over 30 years, I decided to take up the game again, but this time I aim to learn to play it properly. It has the the thoughts of a human master-level player, which are, mistakes and all, better than the all computer analysis lines that anyone can generate. I still like Logical Chess and 'The Most Instructive Games Of Chess Ever Played' is really worth visiting as well. The players you will encounter are Capablanca, Tarrasch, and Rubinstein rather than Karpov, Kasparov, and Kramnik.

I've noticed that I can go through some variations on my head without moving the pieces and without feeling overwhelmed. There are two remarkable promotions of Pawns, and a third in the offing, before White decides to capitulate. First, you can only truly understand what's written if you are actually recreating every move on a chessboard in front of your eyes. Then a few days later I went back and ran through it again, but this time I followed the moves but then I also ran the alternate moves. I could not have been more stupid in ignoring this book so long, not to mention being wrong about all of the above.You see how a lead in development leads to an attack, how the battle for space affects the entire course of the game, and numerous endgames by World Champion Jose Raul Capablanca where simple and elegant play rule the day. I used Chernev's book "Logical Chess" 45 years ago when I was a kid trying to improve my game, and now as I am trying to re-learn the game, an e-book copy of "Logical Chess" is as clear and helpful as it was when I was young. For someone who wants to peel at the hidden complexities of the game, the symbolic representation can work as a deterrent force. The problem with giving up the center and castling, a diagonal iron curtain is formed by whoever is strong in the center, behind which pieces can be manoevered towards the vulnerable g,h pawns.